Biological parents regaining their rights: a psycholegal analysis of a new era in custody disputes.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The evolving American family presents new psycholegal dilemmas. Recently many publicized landmark cases have involved custody disputes in which settlements turn on the genetic component. Although the court acknowledges the principle of "the best interest of the child" as important to the determination of custody, this interest is not absolutely paramount. Court rulings have taken the position that the rights of biological parents are a threshold issue that must be resolved first. Thus, children may be removed from their adoptive and psychological parents through a court order. The authors present a psycholegal analysis of important cases with a guideline for the future.
منابع مشابه
A study of families in high-conflict custody disputes: effects of psychiatric evaluation.
Each year approximately 2.5 million people divorce, subjecting more than 1 million children to the losses of familial breakup. Hostility in families can be greatly exacerbated by parents' repeated failures to negotiate an altered lifestyle for the family which provides for the children's best interests. Interventions with highly conflictual parents and their children must necessarily address th...
متن کاملThe genetic tie.
A friend of mine recently questioned my interest in the "Baby Jessica" saga. "Why are you always so fascinated by those stories?" he asked. "They have nothing to do with Black people." By "those stories," he meant the myriad of disputes occupying the headlines that involve biological claims to children. These custody battles test the importance in American law and culture of the genetic tie bet...
متن کاملThe psychological best interest of the child is not the legal best interest.
The “best interests of the child” is the legal standard in custody disputes. It is also the mental health standard. One gets the impression that the court’s job is to implement the recommendations of the experts, but the principle is not the same in law and mental health. The psychiatric expert is limited to determining the psychological best interest; the court considers additional factors in ...
متن کاملHoarding, hermitage, and the law: why we love the collyer brothers.
Interest in hoarding behavior has intensified, as it works its way through DSM-V deliberations and treatment models. Meanwhile, both documentarians and fiction writers have embraced accounts of individuals with disposophobia and romanticized versions of the Collyer brothers, the Hermits of Harlem. In this article, I examine the range of media and professional attention given to hoarders and the...
متن کاملThe Analysis of Differences of Women’s Rights in Emamiyeh Jurisprudence and Article 16 of the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women (Focusing on Employment, Childbearing and Custody)
Marriage entails a number of rights and responsibilities for every couple (man and wife). In Islamic jurisprudence, these rights and responsibilities have differences with regard to some notes belonging to the article 16 of the convention concerning the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. This being the case, the present study, through descriptive content analysis, has att...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
دوره 23 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1995